Identity-First vs Person-First Language

When talking about neurodivergence (and disability more broadly), people often debate how best to use language — especially when it comes to labels.

Identity-first language puts the identity front and centre: “autistic person,” “ADHD person.” It’s often used by those who see their neurodivergence as a central part of who they are — not something separate or negative.

Person-first language puts the person first: “person with autism,” “person with ADHD.” It’s more common in medical or clinical contexts and was originally promoted to emphasise humanity over diagnosis.

Neither is inherently wrong — but they carry different assumptions. One centres identity, the other separation.

Many in the neurodivergent community prefer identity-first because it affirms their lived experience. Others prefer person-first, especially if they view their diagnosis as something they live with rather than something that defines them.

Best rule of thumb? Use the language someone prefers. And if you’re not sure — ask, or opt for language that’s respectful, inclusive, and avoids medicalising unnecessarily.